Photo of Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

In Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San Diego, ___ F.3d ___, 2011 U.S.App. LEXIS 25581 (9th Cir. 2011), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a church’s claim that a land use permit regulation violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc (“RLUIPA”) was not ripe for judicial review because the church had not completed the requirements for the use permit, and therefore the courts could not determine the particular burden that the church would have to shoulder under the challenged regulation. The court left open the possible argument that the financial cost of complying with a land use permit regulation was so unreasonable or unattainable for a religious institution that such cost could constitute a “substantial burden” on the institution in violation of RLUIPA.
Continue Reading Ninth Circuit Applies Ripeness Requirement To RLUIPA Claims

Stay up-to-date on recent developments in California law affecting land use, planning and environmental compliance. Experts from the field provide succinct and practical analysis on recent case law and significant legislative and administrative changes that took effect this year.
Continue Reading Join William Abbott, Cecily Talbert Barclay & Matthew Gray this Winter at UC Davis Extension Land Use and Natural Resources Program

City engages in impermissible spot zoning and a compensable taking where it creates a “one-house-per-20-acre island in a two-to-six-house-per-acre sea.”
Continue Reading Compensable Taking Found Where City’s Spot Zoning Created “A One-House-Per-20-Acre Island In A Two-To-Six-House-Per-Acre Sea”

In search of CEQA infeasibility: a Sisyphean task.
Continue Reading Lack of Appropriation of Funds by the Legislature for Mitigation of Offsite Traffic Impacts Did Not Discharge the State University from Considering Other Feasible Strategies for Mitigation

In Pfeiffer v. City of Sunnyvale City Council (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1552, the Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, upheld the city’s certification of an EIR and approval of an expansion of the Palo Alto Medical Foundation’s medical campus finding that the city properly deemed the project consistent with its general plan; used the correct baseline for the traffic analysis in the EIR; used the correct baseline for the traffic noise analysis in the EIR; and contained a sufficient discussion of traffic noise impacts in the EIR.
Continue Reading Sunnyvale West Baseline Issue Revisited? Not Exactly.