The First Appellant District Held City of Oakland’s Waterfront Ballpark District Project EIR Was Adequate Except For The Wind Mitigation Measure
Continue Reading The First Appellate District Held City of Oakland’s Waterfront Ballpark District Project EIR Was Adequate Except For The Wind Mitigation Measure
A&K News
NAVIGATING RECENT LEGISLATION ON SECOND UNITS, LOT SPLITS AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN ADDRESSING CALIFORNIA’S HOUSING CRISIS
By William W. Abbott, Patrick L. Enright & Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. on
NAVIGATING RECENT LEGISLATION ON SECOND UNITS, LOT SPLITS AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN ADDRESSING CALIFORNIA’S HOUSING CRISIS…
Continue Reading NAVIGATING RECENT LEGISLATION ON SECOND UNITS, LOT SPLITS AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN ADDRESSING CALIFORNIA’S HOUSING CRISIS
The Second Appellate District Backs City Infill Exemption For Senior-Living Facility in Urban Los Angeles
By William W. Abbott, Patrick L. Enright & Garrett Bergthold on
The Second Appellate District Backs City Infill Exemption For Senior-Living Facility in Urban Los Angeles…
Continue Reading The Second Appellate District Backs City Infill Exemption For Senior-Living Facility in Urban Los Angeles
Subdivision Map Act | UC Davis Continuing and Professional Education
Subdivision Map Act | UC Davis Continuing and Professional Education…
Continue Reading Subdivision Map Act | UC Davis Continuing and Professional Education
Subdivision Map Act | UC Davis Continuing and Professional Education
Subdivision Map Act | UC Davis Continuing and Professional Education…
Continue Reading Subdivision Map Act | UC Davis Continuing and Professional Education
Fourth Appellant District Rules the Project was Materially Changed After the Filing of the Notice of Exemption and Therefore Did Not Trigger the 35-Day Status of Limitation Period.
By Patrick L. Enright & Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. on
https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/D080907.PDF
In Committee to Relocate Marilyn v. City of Palm Springs (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 607, the Fourth Appellate District addressed Palm Springs’ decision to interpret Vehicle Code section 21101 to allow the temporarily closure of City streets for short-term events including holiday parties, neighborhood street fairs, and block parties. The court also addressed the statute…
How Much Is Enough? The Second Appellate District Rules Against Appellant For Failure To Exhaust Administrative Remedies In CEQA Appeal.
California Court of Appeal Issues Wide-Ranging Takings Decision on The Constitutionality of Development Impact Fees
The Court of Appeal issues a significant published opinion in favor of a local government in a lawsuit that challenged legislatively imposed and under the development impact fees under the federal regulatory takings criteria in Nollan/Dolan, requirements of the state’s Mitigation Fee Act. …
Continue Reading California Court of Appeal Issues Wide-Ranging Takings Decision on The Constitutionality of Development Impact Fees
CITY CORRECTLY APPPLIES SEVEN-YEAR-OLD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WHEN APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. & Patrick L. Enright on
Lafayette v. City of Lafayette (2022) 2022 Cal.App.LEXIS 979
A citizens’ group (Save Lafayette) petitioned for a Writ of Mandate, claiming that the project conflicts with the City’s General Plan as it existed when the project was revived in 2018. The trial court denied the petition and the appellate court ruled that despite the lengthy…
Emerging Issues in Evaluating Wildfire Impacts under CEQA: A Resource Guide (Updated November 2023)
By William W. Abbott, Garrett Bergthold & Kara Anderson on
Emerging Issues in Evaluating Wildfire Impacts under CEQA: A Resource Guide (Updated November 2023)…
Continue Reading Emerging Issues in Evaluating Wildfire Impacts under CEQA: A Resource Guide (Updated November 2023)